Mehr als eine einzigartige Implantatoberfläche. Bestmögliche Vorhersagbarkeit.

Die anfängliche biologische Reaktion nach der Implantation ist der erste Schritt zum Erfolg der Therapie zum Zahnersatz.

Wie stellen Sie sicher, dass Sie die Heilungskräfte Ihrer Patienten maximieren, um eine bessere Knochenbasis bei Ihren Implantatbehandlungen zu gewährleisten?

Erwartungen der Patienten bezüglich des Zahnersatzes steigen und individuelle Behandlungsprotokolle werden zunehmend anspruchsvoller.

Wie verringern Sie die Komplexität von Behandlungsprotokollen, um die eigenen Erwartungen zu erfüllen und die Akzeptanz der Patienten zu verbessern?

Patienten mit unterschiedlichsten klinischen Voraussetzungen oder gesundheitlichen Beeinträchtigungen sind immer schwieriger zu behandeln. Damit nehmen die Herausforderungen nehmen zu.

Wie gehen Sie mit dem medizinischen Hintergrund der Patienten um und wie optimieren Sie Ihre Behandlung, um ihnen unbesorgt die verfügbaren Optionen anbieten zu können?

Referenzen

1 Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska N, de Wild M, Wieland M, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A, 76(2):323-334, 2006. 2 De Wild M. Superhydrophilic SLActive® implants. Straumann document 151.52, 2005 3 Katharina Maniura. Laboratory for Materials – Biology Interactions Empa, St. Gallen, Switzerland Protein and blood adsorption on Ti and TiZr implants as a model for osseointegration. EAO 22nd Annual Scientific Meeting, October 17 – 19 2013, Dublin 4 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at non-submerged and submerged chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: an immunohistochemical study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 35.1 (2008): 64–75. 5 Rausch-fan X, Qu Z, Wieland M, Matejka M, Schedle A. Differentiation and cytokine synthesis of human alveolar osteoblasts compared to osteoblast-like cells (MG63) in response to titanium surfaces. Dental Materials 2008 Jan;24(1):102-10. Epub 2007 Apr 27. 6 Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA® titanium implants: Preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 11(4): 481-488, 2007. 7 Lang, N.P., et al., Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans. Clin Oral Implants.Res 22.4 (2011): 349–56. 8 Raghavendra S, Wood MC, Taylor TD. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2005 May–Jun;20(3):425–31. 9 Oates TW, Valderrama P, Bischof M, Nedir R, Jones A, Simpson J, Toutenburg H, Cochran DL. Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA® surface: a randomized pilot study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2007;22(5):755–760. 10 Benic GI, Gallucci GO, Mokti M, Hämmerle CH, Weber HP, Jung RE. Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular-diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 1-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2013; [Epub ahead of print] 11 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86 12 Lai HC, Zhuang LF, Zhang ZY, Wieland M, Liu X. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched implant surfaces at sites with coronal circumferential defects: An experimental study in dogs. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2009;20(3):247–53. 13 Buser D, Wittneben J, Bornstein MM, Grütter L, Chappuis V, Belser UC. Stability of Contour Augmentation and Esthetic Outcomes of Implant-Supported Single Crowns in the Esthetic Zone: 3-Year Result of a Prospective Study With Early Implant Placement Post Extraction. J Periodontol. 2011 March; 82(3): 342-9. 14 Buser D, Chappuis V, Kuchler U, Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, Buser R, Cavusoglu Y, Belser UC. Long-term Stability of Early Implant Placement with Contour Augmentation. J Dent Res. 2013 Dec;92(12 Suppl):176S-82S. 15 Nicolau P, Reis R, Guerra F, Rocha S, Tondela J, Brägger U. Immediate and early loading of Straumann® SLActive implants: A Five Year Follow-up. Presented at the 19th Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Association of Osseointegration – 6-9 October 2010, Glasgow. 16 International Diabetes Federation. http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas/ 17 Schlegel KA, Prechtl C, Möst T, Seidl C, Lutz R, von Wilmowsky C. Osseointegration of SLActive® implants in diabetic pigs Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Feb;24 (2):128-34. 18 Reginster JY, Burlet N. Osteoporosis: a still increasing prevalence. Bone. 2006 Feb;38(2 Suppl 1):S4-9. 19 Mardas N, Schwarz F, Petrie A, Hakimi AR, Donos N. The effect of SLActive® surface in guided bone formation in osteoporotic-like conditions Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Apr;22(4):406-15. 20 WHO: http://www.who.int/ageing/about/facts/en/index.html 21 *iData Report , Dental Implants and Final Abutments, Europe 2012 22 iData Report , Dental Implants and Final Abutments, USA 2012 23 Slotte Christer et al, Four-mm implants supporting fixed partial dentures in the posterior mandible. 5-year results from a multicenter study. Presented at the 20th Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Association of Osseointegration, 10-13 October 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark.